Lust (
a_sin_for_him) wrote2014-11-26 09:20 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
video;
[Lust has been drinking. She doesn't usually indulge to the point where mildly tipsy starts heading to drunk, but it's been an emotional week and two drinks turned into three until she's fiddling with her gear with a half empty wine bottle on the table beside her and a full glass in her hand.
Probably not the best time to flip on the record function and put out a general message.]
Why do emotions have to play such a ridiculously large part in daily life? They're nothing but organic chemical reactions. You mix sodium bicarbonate and acetic acid and get fizzing, bubbling carbonic acid. It's the same damned thing, at the most basic level. Chemicals interact with other chemicals and cause a reaction.
But the molecules that give birth to emotional feeling...they're never dormant. They're never inactive. They're always combining and breaking apart and firing off signals that we have no choice but to be ruled by. Human beings are like a single chemical in that way, one that reacts in a most volatile manner to every other substance and stimulus it encounters.
The sheer number of emotions a single person experiences in a single day... it's overwhelming. And like all chemical reactions, prone to change drastically the moment something new is introduced. The simple act of going from content to frightened or angry or even irritated is enough to interfere with daily life.
That seems like a detrimental design flaw, to me.
Probably not the best time to flip on the record function and put out a general message.]
Why do emotions have to play such a ridiculously large part in daily life? They're nothing but organic chemical reactions. You mix sodium bicarbonate and acetic acid and get fizzing, bubbling carbonic acid. It's the same damned thing, at the most basic level. Chemicals interact with other chemicals and cause a reaction.
But the molecules that give birth to emotional feeling...they're never dormant. They're never inactive. They're always combining and breaking apart and firing off signals that we have no choice but to be ruled by. Human beings are like a single chemical in that way, one that reacts in a most volatile manner to every other substance and stimulus it encounters.
The sheer number of emotions a single person experiences in a single day... it's overwhelming. And like all chemical reactions, prone to change drastically the moment something new is introduced. The simple act of going from content to frightened or angry or even irritated is enough to interfere with daily life.
That seems like a detrimental design flaw, to me.
video;
video;
video;
Perhaps the intensity just blankets all of them, fuck if I know. But I doubt I'd be the first one to say that some emotions are shittier than others.
video;
A poetic statement I'm inclined to agree with.
The unpleasant ones are somehow so much stronger, too.
video;
video;
video;
video;
video;
video;
video;
video;
video;
no subject
...part of it is survival. Adrenaline as part of the fight-or-flight response becomes excitement or anger, and without endorphins humans wouldn't have any incentive to interact with one another or continue the race.
But...even aside from that, if we didn't have any emotions, I don't think you could really say that 'life' exists, at least not the way we think of it. There wouldn't be any variety, it would be...cold. Honestly, I don't think intelligence could even exist at all without emotion along with it.
no subject
Fight or flight and attraction for mating purposes, of course. That's one thing.
But really think about how many things you feel in a single waking period. How the smallest irritation can ruin a mood for the rest of the day. How one minuscule slight from the right person can leave you hurting for weeks. How those feelings permeate everything and effect every single thought you have. Unhappiness of any sort drains the drive, effects thought and decision making, interferes with daily necessities...
One could argue that the removal of feelings leaves nothing but intelligence - pure logic without emotional bias.
no subject
[He offers a small smile.] It'd probably be simpler for everyone that way, I'll admit. You'd sacrifice the concept of 'happiness', but you'd lose 'pain' and 'sadness' as well. Even if I personally wouldn't want that, I understand why a person would.
no subject
[It's all hypothetical, Lust's simply enjoying the chance at a friendly debate with an equal mind.]
It isn't even a matter of what we would want or not - it's their purpose in existence at all. Their dominance over our drives for survival.
[video]
I don't think I can argue with that assessment.
[Feelings aren't bad, but damn it they're hard.]
I'm about to head back to the house, interested in a drinking partner?
[video]
That's supposed to be healthier than drinking alone, isn't it?
Bring more wine. It's going to be a long night.
[video]
[When he does get back to the house he walks straight into the kitchen, sets his shopping bag down on the table next to her with a clink, and goes to grab a glass out of the cabinet.]
Getting any interesting answers?
[That seems like a safe enough way to start this off.]
no subject
Just general debate about the role emotions play in human life.
It's easy to tell those who've always dealt with them and those who came to them later in life.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[Video]
[Her breath is puffing visibly in front of her when she replies, and her cheeks are red. It's chilly out and she's been jogging.]
If we didn't have emotions, it'd be pretty hard to care about anything.
It's tough but you just... I dunno, deal with it?
[... Oh. Now she sees the wine.]
... Are you okay?
[Video]
I'm fine, simply thinking. I like to think and talk about the things I think on.
[Video]
Like, I think the last time anybody needed their appendix was like... five hundred years ago or something.
[She made that date up.]
Nature kinda works by throwing stuff at a wall and seeing what sticks. It ain't perfect.
[Video]
This also assumes that nature is an undisciplined set of circumstances and theories, rather than something with design and intelligent guidance.
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
no subject
[ He's noting that wine bottle though. Looks like this one's dealing with some heavy issues. Ronald's not even gonna question the chemical reactions bit. All the science kinda went over his head. ]
Fancy accepting an offer to lend an ear to your troubles?
no subject
My troubles are all laid out. Emotions - strong ones that reach the surface - are something still new to me.
[Video]
...My sister always talked about how emotions are the building blocks of people, and how they're supposed to make us who we are.
[She shook her head.] I'm not so sure about it, though. I'm terrible with emotions. [Yeah, she'll admit it.] It's easier sometimes to just not focus on them.
[Video]
I think maybe there are many of us who aren't good with them. I've never learned the trick of ignoring them.
[Video]
[that was a mess to be sure.]
...Yeah, me either. [She literally knows that feel.] They always pop up and it's....
[Video]
It's consuming?
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Video]
[Private Video]
video;
... Although it's totally cliche, talking it out sometimes helps.
video;
That was rather on my thoughts when I recorded the address.
video;
[private//unhackable;]
[Since he isn't sure if their nature is a public known fact or not, he's just gonna play it say and turn the convo private.]
That is odd though, now that I think about it. Why were you and the other homunculi turned into humans when you arrived here...?
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private